劲牌70周年品牌官宣，全球征集“劲牌故事”******
1月9日，劲牌公司七十周年品牌官宣发布会活动在武汉举行，拉开了劲牌公司70周年庆祝活动的序幕，发布会官宣了劲牌新的企业品牌战略定位，发布了1953-2022年社会责任报告，启动了“我与劲牌的故事”全球征集活动。
劲牌公司1953年创建于湖北大冶。值此70周年品牌官宣活动之际，劲牌公司发布新的企业品牌战略定位：“创新草本科技创造健康生活”。据了解，此次品牌升级标志着劲牌公司在“健康产品企业”定位下，企业品牌传播聚焦于创新草本科技，赋能产品健康内涵，以人类的健康事业为安身立命之本，坚持走专业化的道路。
发布会上，劲牌公司总裁王楠波携手6位嘉宾共同开启了“我与劲牌的故事”系列全球征集活动，这也标志着庆祝劲牌公司成立七十周年系列活动正式拉开帷幕。据悉，劲牌公司将在2023全年开展一系列庆祝建厂70周年活动，包括70年主题酒的开发、劲粉节、小满封藏节、劲酒健康跑、毛铺草本中国行，以及70周年庆典大会和文艺晚会等。
70年来，劲牌公司以“健康人类、永无止境”的企业精神，“创新草本科技、创造健康生活”的品牌定位，通过提供健康的产品和服务，始终将提高消费者身体素质和生活质量作为企业的使命，致力于成为世界一流的健康产品企业。
劲牌公司拥有“保健酒、健康白酒、中药业”三大业务板块，专注健康产品的研发、生产、销售，分别打造了“中国劲酒、毛铺酒、持正堂”三大核心产品品牌，坚持所有产品和服务必须具有健康内涵和健康价值。
劲牌公司围绕“健康、科技、品质”核心价值，通过创新草本科技赋能产品健康内涵，率先将科学提取技术、中药指纹图谱技术运用于产品生产。目前，劲牌公司拥有专业技术研发人员380余名，与国内外20余家科研院校(机构)开展了多项科研攻关工作，有17项重大科技成果被国内权威机构认定为达到“国际领先(先进)”水平，拥有专利177件。
劲牌公司坚持“好而不同，追求极致”的产品理念，通过精益求精的产品品质为消费者创造健康生活。目前已在湖北黄石、四川宜宾、贵州茅台镇分别建设清、浓、酱三香原酒酿造基地，并拥有130多个中药材直供基地。2021年，劲牌公司获得第十九届全国质量奖组织奖，2022年又获得第二十届全国质量奖个人奖，连续两年获得全国质量奖最高奖项，在全国酒业中，劲牌成为唯一。
劲牌公司秉承“示善怀仁，共生共荣”的社会理念，主动履行企业社会责任，热心公益慈善事业，截至2022年12月，劲牌公司历年累计公益捐赠总额达26.37亿元。先后荣获“中华慈善奖”(四次)、“全国文明单位”(四次)，全国“万企帮万村”精准扶贫行动先进民营企业奖、“绿色工厂”、“全国脱贫攻坚先进集体”等百余项殊荣。
搜索
复制
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事****** 中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。  资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。 日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。 日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。 事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。 因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。 日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。 《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。 德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。 日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。 国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。 太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。  Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business By John Lee (ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year. Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business. The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster. On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year. The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public. In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run. Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public. The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution. The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community. The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses. According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan. As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment. However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact. Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad. The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies. If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence. 
|
